Thursday, 17 November 2022

Retro Review: Lionheart (1990)

Lionheart aka A.W.O.L: Absent Without Leave/Leon
1990
Cast: Jean-Claude Van Damme, Harrison Page, Deborah Renard, Brian Thompson, Michel Quissi, Billy Blanks 
Genre: Action Martial Arts
Worldwide Box Office Gross: over £24 million

Plot: An ex-French soldier begins participating in underground street fights to make money for his brother's family


'Bloodsport - Only Better'

Lionheart was Jean-Claude Van Damme's fourth major billing after Bloodsport, Cyborg and Kickboxer, with the story written by Van Damme himself and who plays Lyon Gautier (no relation to Jean-Paul Gautier). Gautier escapes from the Legion in a region in North Africa/France and initially heads off to America to avenge his brother's attack. When he arrives, he helps pay the sister-in-law's bills and support her youngest daughter. He is also on the run from two blokes of the French Foreign Legion who intend to get hold of Lyon. 


Released at the beginning of the 1990s decade, & just before Van Damme hit his peak with 1992's Universal Soldier and a year on Hard Target, Lionheart is directed by Sheldon Lettich. Lettich went on to direct the entertaining Double ImpactOnly the Strong and the disaster which is The Hard Corps to name.  


Lionheart is more drama first, action second, & it plays out like a version of Kickboxer meets Rocky IV, but with a fish-out-of-water storyline built-in. It is a lot more earnest than Van Damme's latter flicks. It's light on action but heavy on the story and showcases more of his acting chops - which has been a persistent criticism of his film career. Van Damme humanizes Leon and he comes across as not as invincible, but down-to-earth and modest. He has a conscious. The story itself, whilst argued, is pretty rote, bears some weight and is relatively decent as it progresses.


One thing Lionheart and Van Damme didn't capitalize on was making 80s' action B-movie actor Brian Thompson fight Van Damme in a final battle.


Thompson's sharp-suited character was a sidekick who talked more and fought less and it was a missed opportunity to see them square off in a fight, whilst capitalist rich b**** Cynthia was the villainess (that character appears to be a take on Brigette Nielsen in Rocky IV). 


Also in this movie was Michel Quissi - the original Tung Po of the first Kickboxer film, and Quissi here as his character looks, well, your average guy in a suit as one of the French foreign legion guys. His brother also appears, and he fights Van Damme at the end fight.


Fight scenes look scrappier and rougher and are not the usual flashy shenanigans of Van Damme's '90s efforts such as Double Impact, Hard Target, and Universal Soldier. It is less reliant on kicks. Does this alone make it any more inferior? Absolutely not. However, in the context of the story, Leon takes part in these illegal underground street fights to make money for his sister-in-law, Helene, a single mother and daughter, Nicole, Leon's niece, and to give them a better quality of life. But he is not doing this alone, as he enlists a street hustler Joshua to act as his manager. 


Compared to his other films, including the direct- to- DVD cheapo efforts, this Van Damme film has a lot of heart, and it was a total surprise: I didn't think I would enjoy it, but I ended up feeling the opposite, thanks to the added characters besides Leon. Had it not been for them and for them elevating this film further, I would enjoy it less. The melodrama and family angle also pushes the story forward, and that resonates more than the fights, which act as a backdrop. If the fights are the backdrop to Lionheart, then the family angle is the backbone of this film. 



It's earnest, never over-the-top and engaging from beginning to end and the runtime is perfect. The performances are very good, and because of that, it makes the melodrama feel believable, with Van Damme showing some range in his performance. Having him play a character that he wrote that is not one-dimensional but who has a lot to say and having a character that has depth as a human being and person and not just someone who kicks the crap out of people, is interesting to see. 


Van Damme's Rocky, yet way, way superior to The Hard Corps, Lionheart is far more reserved than any of Jean-Claude Van Damme's other films. Many people will look down on this as being silly and too toned down for their liking and prefer a more macho Muscles from Brussels. 


For me, this is much better than it has any right to be. 





Final Verdict:


Bloodsport put Van Damme on the action map alongside Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sylvester Stallone, but with Lionheart, whilst it isn't as recognised as Universal Soldier and Kickboxer, it is sincere and still works as a crowd-pleaser in the same vein as Rocky. As well as one that I might take over Kickboxer and Bloodsport when it comes to competitive fighting movies, as the fish-out-of-water setting gives it that edge.


Lionheart may not offer much, yet with a simple and effective story and an intriguing set of characters, it turns out to be one of JCVD's best. 



Overall: 

Thursday, 3 November 2022

Retro Review: Employee of the Month (2006)

Employee of the month
2006 
Cast: Dane Cook, Jessica Simpson, Dax Shepard, Tim Bagley, Andy Dick, Brian George, Efren Ramirez
Genre: Comedy
Worldwide Box Office Gross: over $38 million 

Plot: A slacker competes with a repeat winner for the ''Employee of the Month'' title at work, in order to gain the affections of a new female employee



'Watching a Retail Comedy with Rarely Any Laughs Is as Tawdry & Predictably Dull as This One Gets'

A non-precursor to NBC's six- season run of the similarly-themed sitcom, Superstore, 2006's Employee of the Month may have been out of the block first, but in actual contrast, lacks the satirical bite and any real wit and insight into the endeavor and life in and around the world of retail; instead, the film pursues a love triangle subplot that doesn't fully convince, with easily forgotten supporting characters, nor does it connect with the audience as both Dane Cook and Jessica Simpson flatter to deceive, whilst Dax Shepard, who reminds me a little of Zac Braff, goes full-on jerk mode as the arrogant cashier, Vince.    

Cook plays a shelf-stacker who mopes through the warehouse at Superclub (a fictional name for a wholesaler. Examples of warehouse-based retail stores include Makro, Costco, Sam's Club, BJ's) -, only to find out he has to go all out in his efforts to attract a newly appointed cashier, who only dates guys who obtain 'Employee of the Month' status. Dax goes up against Vince and the pair battle it out for Amy's affections. 

The film is noted for being filmed in an actual Costco warehouse in Albuquerque, New Mexico. 

Employee of the Month could have been the big -screen Superstore; it ought to have delved into and explored the characters' story arcs, with considerable screen time allocated to each one, not just Dax and Amy's. Had the movie been an ensemble comedy (and ideally so), the story would have flourished. Yet as it wasn't, it didn't work, and the story's scope wasn't broad enough. As such, the story goes nowhere and is aimless. 

I work at Costco and at our warehouse, we have varied characters from walks of life, from different parts of the world with different personalities. I only imagined how much more relatable and better the film would be had Employee of the Month had gone for this approach, instead. 

It also suffers from the lack of genuine comedy and laughs throughout its runtime. it was so tame; I'm not familiar with Dane Cook's material, but even still, I was questioning whether he was the ideal choice for the lead. He didn't sell it. 



Final Verdict:

Caddyshack meets Superstore, Employee of the Month possesses none of the vulgarity of some of the other post-2000s comedies headed by the likes of Will Ferrell and Steve Carell, - something of which I liked; unfortunately, it is relatively bland that doesn't try to attempt to sell itself as a legitimate workplace comedy & with barely enough laughs to keep audiences tuned. Hence, shifting its focus away from being an observational comedy and leaning towards frat boy humour and being more interested in the battle between two employees over an attractive young lady.

I'd watch the seasons of Superstore, instead of sitting through this film.


Overall:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...